Measurement Invariance Between Genders on Two Measures of Borderline Personality Disorder

Author:

Paggeot Amy1,Huprich Steven2

Affiliation:

1. Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan.

2. University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, Michigan.

Abstract

Gender bias in the diagnosis and assessment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) has been the subject of much controversy in the psychological research literature. Evidence regarding differential prevalence rates and diagnostic rates in clinical settings between genders has been mixed, and measurement bias is one potential explanation for these mixed findings. A total of 340 participants were recruited from a Midwestern university and four outpatient community mental health clinics. They were administered two structured clinical interviews for BPD that were then evaluated for measurement invariance. Both the SCID-II BPD scale and the PDI-IV BPD scale were found to be measurement invariant between genders. No significant differences were found on the SCID-II BPD scale in diagnosis or overall number of criteria endorsed. However, in the rates of endorsement of individual criteria, differences were found in the unstable relationships item.

Publisher

Guilford Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3