Comparison of Novel Wide-Field In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy With Skin Biopsy for Assessing Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes

Author:

Badian Reza A.1ORCID,Ekman Linnéa2,Pripp Are Hugo3,Utheim Tor Paaske45,Englund Elisabet6,Dahlin Lars B.278,Rolandsson Olov9,Lagali Neil57ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Unit of Regenerative Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

2. 2Department of Translational Medicine, Hand Surgery, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

3. 3Oslo Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

4. 4Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

5. 5Department of Ophthalmology, Sørlandet Hospital Arendal, Arendal, Norway

6. 6Department of Clinical Sciences, Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

7. 7Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

8. 8Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

9. 9Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Family Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Abstract

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a serious complication of diabetes, where skin biopsy assessing intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) plays an important diagnostic role. In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus has been proposed as a noninvasive diagnostic modality for DPN. Direct comparisons of skin biopsy and IVCM in controlled cohorts are lacking, as IVCM relies on subjective selection of images depicting only 0.2% of the nerve plexus. We compared these diagnostic modalities in a fixed-age cohort of 41 participants with type 2 diabetes and 36 healthy participants using machine algorithms to create wide-field image mosaics and quantify nerves in an area 37 times the size of prior studies to avoid human bias. In the same participants, and at the same time point, no correlation between IENFD and corneal nerve density was found. Corneal nerve density did not correlate with clinical measures of DPN, including neuropathy symptom and disability scores, nerve conduction studies, or quantitative sensory tests. Our findings indicate that corneal and intraepidermal nerves likely mirror different aspects of nerve degeneration, where only intraepidermal nerves appear to reflect the clinical status of DPN, suggesting that scrutiny is warranted concerning methodologies of studies using corneal nerves to assess DPN. Article Highlights Comparison of intraepidermal nerve fiber density with automated wide-field corneal nerve fiber density in participants with type 2 diabetes revealed no correlation between these parameters. Intraepidermal and corneal nerve fibers both detected neurodegeneration in type 2 diabetes, but only intraepidermal nerve fibers were associated with clinical measures of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. A lack of association of corneal nerves with peripheral neuropathy measures suggests that corneal nerve fibers may be a poor biomarker for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3