The National Clinical Care Commission Report to Congress: Background, Methods, and Foundational Recommendations

Author:

Herman William H.1ORCID,Bullock Ann2,Boltri John M.3,Conlin Paul R.45ORCID,Greenlee M. Carol6,Lopata Aaron M.7,Powell Clydette8,Tracer Howard9,Schillinger Dean10

Affiliation:

1. 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

2. 2Division of Diabetes Treatment and Prevention, Indian Health Service, Rockville, MD

3. 3Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH

4. 4Department of Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA

5. 5Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

6. 6Western Slope Endocrinology, Grand Junction, CO

7. 7Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, MD

8. 8School of Medicine and Health Services, George Washington University, Washington, DC

9. 9Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD

10. 10University of California San Francisco School of Medicine and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA

Abstract

Since the first Federal Commission on Diabetes issued its report in 1975, the diabetes epidemic in the U.S. has accelerated, and efforts to translate advances in diabetes treatment into routine clinical practice have stalled. In 2021, the National Clinical Care Commission (NCCC) delivered a report to Congress that provided recommendations to leverage federal policies and programs to more effectively prevent and treat diabetes and its complications. In the five articles in this series, we present the NCCC’s evidence-based recommendations to 1) reduce diabetes-related risks, prevent type 2 diabetes, and avert diabetes complications through changes in federal policies and programs affecting the general population; 2) prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk individuals through targeted lifestyle and medication interventions; and 3) improve the treatment of diabetes and its complications to improve the health outcomes of people with diabetes. In this first article, we review the successes and limitations of previous federal efforts to combat diabetes. We then describe the establishment of and charge to the NCCC. We discuss the development of a hybrid conceptual model that guided the NCCC’s novel all-of-government approach to address diabetes as both a societal and medical problem. We then review the procedures used by the NCCC to gather information from federal agencies, stakeholders, key informants, and the public and to conduct literature reviews. Finally, we review the NCCC’s three foundational recommendations: 1) improve the coordination of non–health-related and health-related federal agencies to address the social and environmental conditions that are accelerating the diabetes epidemic; 2) ensure that all Americans at risk for and with diabetes have health insurance and access to health care; and 3) ensure that all federal policies and programs promote health equity in diabetes.

Funder

Health Resources and Services Administration

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Office of Minority Health

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Indian Health Service

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

American Diabetes Association

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference79 articles.

1. Trends in prevalence of diabetes and control of risk factors in diabetes among US adults, 1999-2018;Wang;JAMA,2021

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . National Diabetes Statistics Report. Accessed 12 October 2022. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Prevalence of Both Diagnosed and Undiagnosed Diabetes, 2020. Accessed 19 August 2021. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/diagnosed-undiagnosed-diabetes.html

4. Diabetes mellitus as a predictor of cancer mortality in a large cohort of US adults;Coughlin;Am J Epidemiol,2004

5. Diabetes mellitus is associated with severe infection and mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Shang;Arch Med Res,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3